[The following is compiled from Mediation A Psychological Insight into Conflict Resolution
by Dr Freddie Strasser & Paul Randolph (Continuum 2004)]
The following is an outline of the format of a typical UK model
of ‘legal’ mediation, generally accepted throughout this country
in non-family mediation. Variations of this format are used in
family mediation and also adopted in some European countries.
Venue and format
There are no prescribed rules as to where a mediation should take place.
It will generally be conducted at one or other of the parties’ lawyers’
offices, or at the premises of the mediator provider. Court-annexed
mediations usually take place on court premises after court
hours.
Mediators may use an assistant or co-Mediator, particularly in more
complex mediations. These co-mediators can be selected in the
same way as the lead mediator, and may be entitled to a fee, or
they may simply be brought in independently by the lead
mediator, with or without a fee. The precise role of the
co-mediator in the mediation will depend upon the lead
mediator’s preferences and his or her style of mediation, as
well as the co-mediator’s level of experience. Some will favour
a joint approach, treating the co-mediator as part of the
‘mediation team’. Others will prefer to use the second mediator
as an assistant: to take notes if appropriate, or to write on
the flip chart or board if available, us, and in between the
caucus sessions, to discuss and brainstorm issues which have
arisen.
The mediator’s opening
The mediation usually
commences with all parties together in one room, invariably
around a table. The mediator will make an opening statement in
which he or she will outline to all present the aims of the
process and the mediator’s role in it. It remains surprising
how many parties attending mediations, whether experienced
lawyers or simply members of the public, are not aware of how
mediation works. So it will be necessary for the mediator to
state the purpose of the process and the procedure to be
adopted. The mediator will outline and emphasise that his or
her function is that of a neutral facilitator and not an
adjudicator or arbitrator. He or she will outline what is to
happen, detailing the way in which joint sessions and private
‘caucus’ sessions will be used.
The parties’ opening statements
Each party, and/or their legal advisor, makes a short opening statement,
without interruption, setting out the main points of their
case. This is a vital element of the mediation and its effect
should not be underestimated. It can set the tone for the
entire proceedings that follow. Where the dispute has hitherto
been conducted by correspondence, it may well be the first time
that the parties meet face-to-face; it will probably be the
first time that one party has an opportunity to hear the other
side’s story first hand, rather than sifted, repeated, and
interpreted by a number of intermediaries. It will invariably
be the first time, for example, that one party’s insurer or
other decision-maker comes face to face with the other party.
And sometimes it is the first opportunity to see the other
side’s lawyers ‘in action’; this can often be a salutary
experience, as each party will undoubtedly have had a mental
image of the other side’s lawyers, and perhaps to see that they
are ‘human’, and doing just as good a job if not better than
their own lawyers, can occasionally help to move the dispute
forward. For these reasons, the opening statements can be a
most therapeutic constituent of the process, and consequently
the parties should use it to good advantage.
Too frequently, lawyers are asked to furnish their party’s opening
address and use the occasion simply to regurgitate, ostensibly
for the mediator’s benefit, a series of legal submissions. This
merely demonstrates a basic misunderstanding of the role and
function of the mediator, mistaking him or her for an
arbitrator, and only serves to irritate the other side. Rather,
the parties should be encouraged to give their statements
themselves, setting out a more personal perspective of the
dispute, augmented if necessary by their lawyers. This is
their "day in court" and it is their chance to be truly heard
and to convey the extent and depth of their feelings - to "tell
it from the heart".
Private caucus sessions
At the conclusion of the opening statements, the parties will generally
(in the UK model of mediation) separate for the separate
"caucus" sessions into their respective rooms. This simply
means the private individual session where the mediator sees
each party privately and in confidence on their own. If there
is a room allocated for the mediation itself, the mediator may
invite each party to come to that room for the private caucus
sessions. More usually, however, the mediator will visit the
parties in their respective rooms. The format of the foregoing
will obviously depend upon the venue, the number of parties,
whether the mediator is acting alone or with a co-mediator, and
the facilities available in each room.
Joint sessions
The separate caucus sessions will normally continue until such time as the
mediator feels it appropriate to bring the parties back
together. The question as to whether, and if so when, the
mediator should bring the parties back together for a joint
session is largely a matter of judgment, either for the mediator
alone, or with the input of the other parties. It can also be a
matter of style: those who adopt the model of mediation in which
caucuses are rarely used, will prefer to conduct as much of the
mediation in joint session as possible.
Joint sessions can effectively be used when the parties have reached a
sufficient accord in principle, so as to justify bringing them
together to finalise and shape the more detailed points of the
settlement. Whether the parties have in fact reached such a
stage may in itself be a matter of delicate judgment.
Settlement agreement
Once a true settlement is reached, the step that transforms the
mediation from a voluntary non-binding process to a fully
binding accord is the signing of a settlement agreement. The
parties will need to create a document which they can each sign to
signify their acceptance to being bound. A "Heads of Agreement"
document will usually be drafted immediately, either by the parties
themselves or by the lawyers if they are present, or by the mediator.
The only matter then remaining is who buys the champagne!
top